You actually don't think and don't know, since a good few of you actually got on bad terms with me because I was arguing with friends of yours (likely other moderators/administrators) and you are quick to jump the bandwagon of "gotta help my friend" without knowing contexts and events, with rudeness and insults. If that is what you call respect, so be it. I just gave the same right back, as I shouldn't have.
Despite the fact I was there and have firsthand experience of the claims made, all of that is still mounting evidence against you, in addition to your constant bickering with staff in this thread. And besides, we're all friends and we're all staff, and we all trust each other. I can put stock in what they say because I know they're trustworthy people. The same cannot be said for you.
Despite the fact I was there and have firsthand experience of the claims made, all of that is still mounting evidence against you, in addition to your constant bickering with staff in this thread. And besides, we're all friends and we're all staff, and we all trust each other. I can put stock in what they say because I know they're trustworthy people. The same cannot be said for you.
So "hurr de durr iz muh friend" > common sense, logic and facts. Alright, got it there. What's the problem with "bickering with staff"? Do you expect me to just shut up and not reply with the bitter truth? Is civil argumentation (which you are trying to turn into demonizing and ridiculing me) so insulting to you? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Sorry, not going to happen.
What's insulting is you disregarding the fact that the truth is not as you say it is, even with witnesses attesting what happened. We are not as stupid as you think. And what happened to "I should have kept my cool", anyway? No matter how right you think you are, all of this is digging you deeper and deeper and giving us more reason to keep you banned. Your arguments are getting less and less civil by the post.
What's insulting is you disregarding the fact that the truth is not as you say it is, even with witnesses attesting what happened. We are not as stupid as you think. And what happened to "I should have kept my cool", anyway? No matter how right you think you are, all of this is digging you deeper and deeper and giving us more reason to keep you banned. Your arguments are getting less and less civil by the post.
Of course they are getting less and less civil, because you are doing the same. What is this "the truth is not as you say it is"? I haven't even discussed any event in actual fine detail with you. The mere belief that most of you think I did something "horrible" to Pika screams of you either having extremely poor recollection or again, friend bias, which is indeed the case. I have never disrespected anyone before without being disrespected first. There is no witnesses to that. If you do have said witnesses, they clearly were not paying attention or again, friend bias, which you yourself have admitted to doing.
Despite the fact I was there and have firsthand experience of the claims made, all of that is still mounting evidence against you, in addition to your constant bickering with staff in this thread. And besides, we're all friends and we're all staff, and we all trust each other. I can put stock in what they say because I know they're trustworthy people. The same cannot be said for you.
So "hurr de durr iz muh friend" > common sense, logic and facts. Alright, got it there. What's the problem with "bickering with staff"? Do you expect me to just shut up and not reply with the bitter truth? Is civil argumentation (which you are trying to turn into demonizing and ridiculing me) so insulting to you? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Sorry, not going to happen.
First of all, fairly sure a lot of us were present when the events unfolded, so don't assume we're stupid and are just jumping on a mindless bandwagon. Second of all, what would make you more 'civil' is actually giving a proper apology to pika because while you may not think you said much to him, ever considered how he felt about it? People react differently to things said to them. Pika was quite hurt by your statements, and I'm not willing to let something like that slide.
Finally, you were bickering with staff because you got told no countless times with your stuff. Yet you still insisted and kept on being persistent until it eventually got unbearable and annoying. We weren't oppressing you or demonizing you, or whatever it is, we just said no to your suggestions and you decided to be annoyingly persistent about it because you just could not get the idea through your head.
I advise you take a good look at yourself first before you try to assume stuff about the rest of us.
Meow covered just about everything wrong with your srgument, so I only have one thing to add - of course we're going to be biased to friends: our friends are trusted staff members. We could listen to them, or the claims of someone who keeps reusing the same points and ignoring the very real and valid evidence.
